Home » Featured, Headline

Tapioca and the Tata Nano Lessons in using PR for Marketing

26 January 2012 12 Comments

The Nano, if you recall, took its avatar to rescue the struggling section of the Indian middle class families to thundering applause from the world in general. The car is widely seen as a fine case of using a company’s PR machinery effectively for marketing a product. And it is not difficult to see reason in the argument – before spending a single rupee towards marketing the product, everyone was already talking about the car. The cacophony grew louder as the product was first unveiled in 2008 and broke to deafening levels towards its final release date. So all went well up to this point, right?

Well, I am here to argue just the exact opposite; to point out why the free publicity was not such a good idea after all.

 The Nano story

At the Geneva Motor show in 2003,Ratan Tata expressed his empathy for the middle class Indian family that plies on Bajaj Chetaks like performers from a Russian Circus. The rest, as they often say, is history. Media houses the world over ran features on the $2500 ‘Car for the Masses’. People saw this as an event that could trigger the magic Ford Model T and the Volks Wagon Beetle created in the last century.

We have to appreciate the fact that as a product, the Nano exceeded people’s expectations of a Re.1 lakh car. But, a few fire scares, a farmers’ revolt, a construction plant move across the breadth of the country and an HBR case later, the magic everyone expected from the Nano is nowhere to be seen. For a product that was predicted to swarm Indian cities in huge numbers to cause traffic jams and increase carbon footprint of the country, the customer response to the Nano has been underwhelming to say the least.

Tata Motors did take various steps it deemed necessary to make the buying process smooth for the intended target folks – the initial cash payment needed is only 15-20 thousand rupees, customers could apply to purchase a Nano at more than 30,000 locations in 1,000 cities, low EMI loans are available, bookings can be made at various points including Croma stores,the infamous fire incidents were dealt with, more variants were introduced and diesel models were on their way. The sales figures were pretty disheartening at one point, touching a low of just 500 numbers in November 2010, but have recovered since then due to the above mentioned measures. But still the numbers are way adrift of the expectations.

So, what went wrong?

This is where the Tapioca story becomes relevant. Also known as Cassava, this tuber is a staple food for about 500 million of the world population, mostly in the tropical regions. Like the Potato, Tapioca too originated in the Andes and was spread across the world by European traders.

It was the second half of the 19th century and the erstwhile kingdom of Travancore was experiencing a severe famine. The King was looking for cheaper, easy to grow alternatives for rice and found the solution to be the Tapioca tuber brought by the Portuguese. Tapioca was perfect for the population’s need and geography. Cheap to cultivate, has similar carbohydrate content as rice and can be used with the same side dishes as rice. But making the whole Kingdom adopt this new crop was a problem. Pepsico and Kellogg’s turmoil in India show how difficult it is to get into people’s food habits.

Anyways, the King had enough marketing acumen to know that even at the Bottom of the Pyramid, people look for value and that brand positioning is critical. The King couldn’t just issue an order to get it adopted by the masses saying it’s cheap and easy to cultivate and cook.

And thus born was the mother of all marketing tricks.

The legend has it that, the King cultivated the tuber on a field adjacent to the palace, with a fence around it and the army deployed to guard it. Announcements were made in true royal style around the kingdom about the Special Royal Plant imported from Portugal exclusively for the King and the royal family. The announcements also described in detail the cultivation and cooking of Tapioca, including how to recognize when the plants are ready for harvesting and replanting. And of course, there were severe penalties involved if anyone is found meddling with the exclusive crop.

So when the crop near the palace was ready for harvesting, the whole country knew exactly how delicious tapioca dish is and what to do if you get hold of some. And one of those days, for reasons known only to the King, the army was withdrawn from the crop’s guarding duty. And no marks for guessing, silly Mallus(I am a rich, intellectual, handsome, soft spoken Mallu myself, so you can’t ban my next 8 articles for this racist comment)were thus tricked into stealing the whole crop overnight.And it is the second most common staple food in the state of Kerala to this day.

Back to the Nano

Travancore’s almighty King had the sense not to say “You poor, famished folks – take this Tapioca I imported for you and cultivate for food – they are cheaper than rice and easier to grow”. In comparison, think of how the Nano came across in its communications.

“Ratan Tata announces the world’s cheapest motor car. Tata is making it for the Indian middle class family that balances on a scooter, battling the harsh Indian weather“

If I am an Indian middle class family owning a bike/scooter, will I buy a car that is available between 1-2 lakhs? Probably yes. But, will I buy a car that comes with these positioning statements? Probably not.

I am speaking about not the exact phrases from the Tatas, but rather how the message reached the public through news paper, television and other media. Once the Tata PR machinery started the campaign, the story went viral, and till the first photographs of the model came out, cheap carwas the most prominent phrase used while people spoke about the car.Tatas wanted everyone to know about the ‘affordable’, low priced car, but what stuck every one’s mind was the ‘cheap car’ tag

A stock market cartoon inspired by the Nano PR campaign:


What I believe is that the company could have tackled this problem with its initial advertising. It in fact did a good job with the print ads, talking up the technological innovation, numerous patents etc. But where it slipped up was the TVCs. The launch ad is sweet and to the point. But the follow ups, though well executed, were probably stressing the wrong points. They spoke about the comforts of a car in comparison to a scooter/bike. I would think that these hygiene factors are facts known to the public already. What the public really wanted to know was about the car’s performance and safety. And even if these were addressed, there still was the little elephant in the room – the ‘cheap car’ tag. Talking of little elephants, remember how the Tata Ace was launched – a vehicle with engine capacity similar to the Nano, it was called ‘the little elephant’ and the imagery stuck very nicely for it, giving the robust feel.

There is a perception that the Nano is way too basic – it is NOT. People still buy the costlier Marutis and Hyundais without A/C and power steering, showing that Indians don’t have a problem with using basic cars. It works because at a glance, pretty much all the models look the same and these cars are perceived to be standard classy acts in the rural areas.

The company came up with an awesome product, corrected its glitches, worked on the price barrier and distribution and started promoting it. The sales figures showed a surprising fact – the car was being bought by the urban rich as a toy or a second car for city use and the intended target of the middle class was less forthcoming with orders to buy the product.

For the first category mentioned here, the Nano is a utility car which they consider to be cute, and they do not care about the small boot space or how it is perceived due to its low prices. But, for the rural markets, the people who are buying their first car, it is a matter of pride and prestige. They would rather not buy a car than buy one their neighbor considers to be cheap

Having said that, talks of the Nano being a flop is premature. The Tatas seem to have figured out a little bit about the problems and recent press releases spoke about concentrating on higher end variants of the car and their promotion. Also we have to remember that the company has the experience of producing the Indicas for a long time suffering huge losses, till it finally turned around. The Nano is too good a product to fail and Tata has the financial muscle to carry the car until it breaks even.

———————————————————————————————-

Sajith is a PGDM student at IIM Calcutta, batch of 2013. A photographer and writer wannabe, he seldom tries either. In fact it was him who advised the Joker not to do stuff for free. For reasons beyond his grasp, Sajith is not affected by cricket or music. Filthy rich, handsome and soft spoken, he travels hundreds of kilometers to find sea bridges and deserted beaches so he can read his favorites Chandamama and Chekhov. You can reach him at facebook.com/sajithps.

Related posts:

  1. Rewinding to the Tata Indica
  2. The CATs guide to Marketing
  3. Ulhaas’11- The Experiential Marketing Carnival
  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Vysakh-Vasudevan/100001239175761 Vysakh Vasudevan

    congo bro..
    a classy one..

  • Shashank Kumar

    Very well written article. Kudos and welcome! :)

  • Nitesh

    Cool article. Awesome work.

  • Neha Manhas

    Well written! 

  • Sebin Kollamana

    Sajith,
     Well said!  A classy article..

  • Mickey

    So well described the past present and lil about future.
    It was bit surprising that how an Indian company missed Indian market mindset of “Car as a sense of pride”. Hope the new futuristic nano aka Pixel will change the image of such a great engineering product which surprised the whole world.

  • http://themarketers.in/ Sahil Dev

    sdfjrsgregert

  • Sajith

    Thanks Kanishk.
    I agree with you on the point that people have no problem buying things tagged ‘cheap’. But at the same time, a car is a high engagement product the likes of which will definitely be affected by the ‘cheap’ tag.The thought of this article first occurred to me when somebody I knew was planning to buy an entry level car by financing it with a loan. I asked her why they are not buying a Nano, in which case she wouldn’t have to take a loan as she had the money to buy one.

  • Sajith

    Completely agree with your point of view Partha. The positioning of competing with scooters was something I wanted to mention but missed out while drafting. Like in these TVCs  Rain - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFZ9v73cyGo, Tickle - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ArURAxJ2a-Q&feature=endscreen&NR=1 and  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=813BNF_V_T4 , the car is compared directly with bikes/scooters…

  • http://www.facebook.com/nchhetan Nawang Chhetan

    Taking forward the argument about “Cheap Car” I think even in developed markets like EU, someone would like to have a Nano besides fuel a guzzling car. He’ll not use it to work but may be to buy grocories or visit friends. So the idea of prestige doesn’t come into play, it is about functionality.
    Nice article and best of luck.

  • Partha

    Excellent article Sajith. You have hit the nail on the right spot. 

    I have a similar interpretation of the Nano story, albeit with a little bit of tweak. 

    A car, very often is associated with prestige, higher earning capability and general well being of a family. Even with cheap loans running around, when a person buys a car, his neighbors will definitely feel that he is more well-to-do now than he was before, thanks only to the car. 

    Nano was positioned; or for that matter, came across to be positioned as a car which was a “low cost substitute” for an entry level Maruti 800 or Maruti Alto. For a person who would purchase a Nano, his neighbors or social circles would definitely perceive that he probably could not afford even an 800 or Alto. That typically does not go well with an Indian mindset.

    I strongly feel that Nano should have fought well with entry level cars rather than competing with a motorcycle. That way, the message would have been clearer and customers would have known that they were buying an awesome fuel efficient and innovative car called Nano. 

    Cheers,

    Partha

  • http://www.facebook.com/kanishk.arya Kanishk Arya

    Good work Sajith.

    I was wondering if someone who needs financing for a Nano worth 1 lakh would care about the cheap tag? There are a lot of things that the middle and upper classes call “Cheap” but that doesn’t stop those items from being sold to the customers who find them “Value for money”. They might even go ahead and claim that rich have a tendency of wasting money to show off.

    Having said that it’s true that ideally no one would want a “Cheap” tag associated with something that they’re spending an amount which is considerable for them.